Posts Tagged ‘David Rimanelli’

Dance to the New SIC

Sunday, February 28th, 2010
The Man. The Legend.

The Man. The Legend.

“He’s totally crazy!” an insider confided to me. “He wrote this insane book all about himself” (which said insider admits he has never read) “and gets all his friends together to read it. That’s crazy!”

But good crazy, right?

1. Adam McEwen 2. Matthew Higgs 3. Richard Phillips 4. Stefania Bortolami 5. Sean Landers

1. Adam McEwen 2. Matthew Higgs 3. Richard Phillips 4. Stefania Bortolami 5. Sean Landers

At an event produced by Art Production Fund and White Columns, an all-star roster of art world veterans read from the revised edition of Sean Landers’ SIC, originally printed as (sic) almost twenty years ago. The daisy chain of old friends read nonstop till 2am, by which time the audience had been whittled down to a few concrete devotees, who were rewarded with delicious pizza and the remnants of the vodka open bar.

(l-r) Artists Richard Phillips, John Currin; Jonathan Horowitz, Rob Pruitt

(l-r) Artists Richard Phillips, John Currin; Jonathan Horowitz, Rob Pruitt

Readers included the old bachelor-pad studiomates John Currin, Richard Phillips, and brother Kevin Landers; the stately art-world incarnate Clarissa Dalrymple; former Landers dealer Andrea Rosen; new Landers dealer Friedrich Petzel; and of course, Sean Landers himself.  Rob Pruitt was lined up to read, only minutes after the signing party at nearby Gavin Brown for his new book, Pop Touched Me.  He didn’t get to read, however, as the event’s schedule required some trimming for brevity.

The Fab Forties

The Fab Forties

Star-studded? Indeed, there was even a portrait station to capture each of the shimmering pulsars participating.

White Columns' Matthew Higgs ready for his close-up

White Columns' Matthew Higgs ready for his close-up

Like a teen dunking his little brother while swimming, SIC plunges its readers into the neurotic cesspools of Sean Landers’ polarized self-evaluations. His ruminations, mostly phallocentric, regularly cover masturbation, getting laid, and the shortcomings of his own anatomy.

(l) Clarissa Dalrymple and reclining Matthew Higgs; (r) Andrea Rosen

(l) Clarissa Dalrymple and reclining Matthew Higgs; (r) Andrea Rosen

But he also circles the pithy topics of an old friend hopelessly lost in poetic misanthropy, the welcome gentrification of his neighborhood and himself as he turns 30, a revitalizing yet anticlimactic love affair in Greece, and the gradual, painful sinking of his relationship with Michelle, his girlfriend of three years at the time.  She is now his wife, but that break-up nearly pushed him over the edge.  Luckily, there is a dramatic deus-ex-machina rescue by the tender memory of Sean’s long dead sister.

(l-r) New (sic), new (sic), old (sic)

(l-r) New SIC, new SIC, old (sic)

The new version of (sic) is so heavily revised that it was difficult for me to read along in my 1993 print.  But revisions might be helpful.  The 1993 version frustrated readers because of its protagonist’s recurring self-flagellation, the manic-depressive pace, and the aimless march of unresolved conflicts. But the funny parts are hysterical and the intimate candor seems touching; and doesn’t retouching the text compromise the stream-0f-conscious spontaneity that makes it so gripping?

The ageless, sexy Cecily Brown reading (sic)

The ageless, sexy Cecily Brown reading SICDa

I love the book. But did the evening’s stream of readers dissipate into an arduous drone? Was there nothing to look at, something frustrating for an audience of visual artists? The projection cast behind the reader added nothing but scale and light. How about an accompanying slideshow? Or intermittent projections of the handwritten manuscript?

cockwise from top left: Gavin Brown, Jessica Craig-Martin, same, Adam McEwen

cockwise from top left: Gavin Brown, Jessica Craig-Martin, same, Adam McEwen

And did the absence of young artists participating seem to wall up Sean Landers and his peers from the great flea market of influence? This blog praises without reservation Sean Landers as a titan of 1990s art, and for some critics, he is THE FACE of that period’s slacker art. But the phalanx of mostly heterosexual 40-somethings seemed to deny the intergenerational fertility of Sean Landers’ work…

svabloglandersreadingfriends

…which should be extruded through the channels of more mixed 30- and 20-somethings. Once a 90s artist, always a 90s artist? (I sure hope not! I wish there were more artists like Sean Landers.)  What will a decade with Petzel produce?

Op Posits a Tract

Saturday, February 28th, 2009

Xylor Jane opened her third solo show at CANADA last week. Based in Massachusetts, but from San Francisco, the last place I saw her work in NYC was at Deitch Projects, where it was included in Constraction, curated by Kathy Grayson.

All of the new paintings are on wood panel, and most are square in shape. Each hosts grid systems of spectral color that build fields of shimmering and vibrating shapes, or tightly periodic cellular units and patterns. The latter approach, seen in Gates, one of the strongest pieces, is like a perpetually repeating Tetris game filtered through a broken record/ broken record/ broken record/ broken record.

Xylor Jane, Bombinating

Xylor Jane, Bombinating

The geometric incandescence of these paintings beacons you toward them, and they tease you with promise of pattern, inviting and luring you into the flickering fields to track the patterns, to see where and when repetition occurs. And as you begin to perceive the formulas that foster repetition, you begin to detect numerical forms rendered in round pixels of color, usually bold and from the tube, or iridescent and mixed with silver. Looking closer, you notice the neatly drafted grid lines spanning the panel surface. And closer still, you notice tiny handwritten characters, usually numbers, which perhaps guide the artist through these dense matrices of Skittles and braille. This gives these painters’ paintings some sugar for Conceptual-minded viewers, because those eggheads get a chance to peek into the thought process that generated the paintings.

Some paintings reflect themselves: in a binary manner, the left side mirrors the right, or top to bottom [(or vice versa) (or vice versa), respectively]. Others unfold into quadrants, each reflecting its border neighbors. This relationship between quadrants restricts randomness, chance, and arbitrary decisions. The pixels were plotted according to a system, and repeat in neighboring quadrants, reflexively bound and determined to their location.

Xylor Jane, Selfsame

Xylor Jane, Selfsame

But how does Xylor Jane decide on her sequences of colors? According to the artist, the ROYGBIV spectrum coincides with calendar dates and prime numbers. Some paintings even scroll lists of prime numbers. I don’t know exactly how she connects the numbers and dates to colors, but it is apparent that she has a system, and that is good enough for me. The paintings function to track and document passage of time, or progressions of numbers. (How great that this show follows on the heels of the recent show and review of On Kawara’s One Million Years, experientially tedious but historically necessary.) Thus, the paintings gradually reveal both sequence and development, yet they also preclude development within themselves, because the grid/quadrant/reflection rules restrict all ranges of variation possible. Each section can be only what the others determine it to be.

They make you dizzy and confused, and never settled with your perception of the painting. Unable to conclusively locate their edges, we are handicapped; the painting might as well be moving on its own. The optical dazzle identifies these paintings as Op, and therefore psychedelic. (David Rimanelli wrote in Artforum (May 2007) about Op art and 1960s psychedelia.) On a trippy vibe, the paintings reach for otherworldy engagement. But they simultaneously keep a foot in another extraterrestrial system, that being mathematics. Math is prior to perception and its independent relations persist whether or not we are paying attention. Xylor’s work contorts to straddle both psychedelic para-perception and rational epi-perception. The paintings are like talismans of extraempirical dimensions. Maybe that’s why the show is called N.D.E., standing for Near Death Experience: the show takes us to the precipice of alternative realities.

Aaron Johnson, Bad Precedent, 2007

Aaron Johnson, Bad Precedent

In that same Artforum article, David Rimanelli designates the apparent Op resurgence as a “blip.” But is there a substantial Op art revolution? Constraction was just once example. Deitch offers another with the current Ben Jones show, and earlier projects by Assume Vivid Astro Focus (Happy Birthday, Eli!). Painter Aaron Johnson uses op patterns. Ara Peterson’s painted wood sculptures induce vertigo as much as wonder. And up-and-coming David Malek opens a show next week that looks likely to Op all the place.

David Malek, Astronaut Food, 2009

David Malek, Astronaut Food, 2009

Akiyoshi Kitaoka, Animal Collective, "Merriweather Post Pavilion" album cover

Akiyoshi Kitaoka, Animal Collective, Merriweather Post Pavilion album cover

Bradford Cox, Deerhunter Cryptograms album cover

Bradford Cox, Deerhunter Cryptograms album cover

IMAGES: CANADA Gallery, Stux Gallery, Smith-Stewart Gallery, Anonymous
School of Visual Arts Site
Continuing Education Site
Send stories, links, and tips to
ce-news@sva.edu